Nothing But Bet · scheme lookup

Man vs
zone

Find the players and offenses whose receiving production changed most by coverage family, then identify the defenses whose usage sat farthest from the FBS median.

Qualified players: 268; 50+ man · 50+ zone routes
Qualified offenses: 122; 2+ receivers
Defense population: 136; 28.6% median man rate
Measured season: 2025; Regular season · weeks 0–16

Find player or team

Favorable / outlier side

01 · player dependence

Largest man-zone production gaps

Qualified receiving players ranked by the absolute difference in yards per route run.

268of 268

Rank	Player	Team	Score	Better vs	Man YPRR	Zone YPRR	Gap	Routes M/Z
1	Charlie BeckerWR	Indiana	100.0	man	5.00	1.83	3.17	70/104
2	Asaad WaseemWR · measured at Florida Atlantic	Purdue	99.6	man	3.65	1.31	2.34	77/239
3	Josiah FreemanWR	Fresno State	99.3	man	3.49	1.18	2.31	102/168
4	Jacquon GibsonWR · measured at Massachusetts	Virginia	98.9	zone	0.75	2.95	2.20	53/190
5	Micahi DanzyWR	Florida State	98.5	zone	0.26	2.45	2.19	50/178
6	Danny ScuderoWR · measured at San José State	Colorado	98.1	man	4.45	2.27	2.18	116/273
7	Houston ThomasTE · measured at UTSA	Texas A&M	97.8	zone	0.37	2.42	2.05	63/100
8	Anthony Brown-StephensWR	Tulane	97.4	zone	0.33	2.37	2.04	55/185
9	Carlos HernandezWR	Wake Forest	97.0	zone	0.87	2.87	2.00	52/192
10	Nahzae CoxWR · measured at Middle Tennessee	Kansas	96.6	man	2.76	0.76	2.00	102/187
11	Peter ClarkeTE	Temple	96.3	zone	1.02	2.99	1.97	51/114
12	Terrell AndersonWR · measured at NC State	USC	95.9	man	3.48	1.55	1.93	86/157
13	Caleb GoodieWR · measured at Cincinnati	Missouri	95.3	zone	0.17	2.09	1.92	84/178
14	Nyck HarborWR	South Carolina	95.3	zone	0.94	2.86	1.92	69/186
15	Jamari JohnsonTE	Oregon	94.8	man	3.78	1.86	1.92	50/121
16	Trey'Dez GreenTE	LSU	94.4	man	3.15	1.26	1.89	65/155
17	Eli FinleyTE	Louisiana Tech	94.0	man	3.39	1.56	1.83	51/140
18	Donovan BrownWR	San Diego State	93.6	zone	0.70	2.42	1.72	93/170
19	Emmett Mosley VWR	Texas	93.3	zone	0.67	2.38	1.71	52/128
20	Vandrevius JacobsWR · measured at South Carolina	Miami	92.9	zone	0.68	2.33	1.65	75/180
21	Kenny OdomWR · measured at UTEP	South Florida	92.5	man	3.29	1.65	1.64	63/214
22	Dominique HenryWR	Florida Atlantic	92.1	man	2.57	0.93	1.64	96/291
23	Chase HendricksWR · measured at Ohio	California	91.8	man	3.97	2.36	1.61	112/220
24	Junior SherrillWR	Vanderbilt	91.4	zone	1.04	2.65	1.61	102/231
25	Tre' BrownWR · measured at Old Dominion	LSU	91.0	zone	1.36	2.93	1.57	66/203
26	Ryan WingoWR	Texas	90.6	zone	1.43	2.99	1.56	80/218
27	Rico Flores Jr.WR · measured at UCLA	Virginia	90.3	zone	0.11	1.67	1.56	65/130
28	Chris ReedWR	Sam Houston	89.9	man	2.83	1.29	1.54	88/121
29	Chris MarshallWR · measured at Boise State	Arkansas	89.5	man	2.97	1.46	1.51	106/177
30	Coy EakinWR	Texas Tech	89.1	zone	0.78	2.29	1.51	117/216
31	Cam'ron LacyWR	Middle Tennessee	88.8	zone	1.89	3.35	1.46	56/116
32	Amorion WalkerWR · measured at Middle Tennessee	UNLV	88.4	man	2.04	0.61	1.43	56/114
33	Hardley Gilmore IVWR	Kentucky	88.0	man	2.22	0.80	1.42	55/153
34	David Amador IIWR	UTSA	87.6	zone	0.92	2.34	1.42	64/149
35	Chris Dawn Jr.WR	Texas State	87.3	zone	1.87	3.28	1.41	95/220
36	Christian MossWR · measured at Kennesaw State	Washington	86.9	zone	0.70	2.10	1.40	99/242
37	Keshaun SingletonWR · measured at South Florida	Auburn	86.5	man	3.39	2.05	1.34	75/227
38	DeAndre Moore Jr.WR · measured at Texas	Colorado	86.1	zone	1.17	2.49	1.32	64/159
39	Jeremiah SmithWR	Ohio State	85.8	zone	2.58	3.90	1.32	65/231
40	Deondre JohnsonWR	Jacksonville State	85.4	zone	1.16	2.46	1.30	85/223
41	Lawayne McCoyWR · measured at Florida State	Louisville	85.0	zone	0.45	1.74	1.29	55/167
42	Clayton Coppock Jr.WR · measured at Kennesaw State	Coastal Carolina	84.6	zone	0.59	1.86	1.27	54/145
43	Ayden WilliamsWR	Mississippi State	84.3	zone	0.00	1.24	1.24	73/200
44	DeAngelo Irvin Jr.WR	UNLV	83.9	zone	0.16	1.39	1.23	67/114
45	Landon EllisWR · measured at James Madison	UCLA	83.5	zone	1.63	2.85	1.22	63/158
46	Armani WinfieldWR · measured at Colorado State	South Florida	83.1	zone	0.52	1.73	1.21	62/128
47	Shazz PrestonWR · measured at Tulane	Indiana	82.8	zone	1.43	2.62	1.19	67/188
48	Taz ReddicksWR · measured at Oregon State	UNLV	82.4	zone	1.13	2.32	1.19	62/114
49	Anthony GarciaWR	Utah State	82.0	zone	0.66	1.84	1.18	64/146
50	Javen NicholasWR · measured at Charlotte	Duke	81.3	man	2.53	1.38	1.15	70/233
51	Nik McMillanWR · measured at Buffalo	Kansas	81.3	man	3.02	1.87	1.15	125/239
52	Reed HarrisWR · measured at Boston College	Arizona State	81.3	zone	0.64	1.79	1.15	128/296
53	Lotzeir BrooksWR	Alabama	80.3	man	2.87	1.73	1.14	53/154
54	Mike MatthewsWR	Tennessee	80.3	zone	1.15	2.29	1.14	79/293
55	Donovan OlugbodeWR	Missouri	79.8	man	2.82	1.68	1.14	55/116
56	Garrett OakleyTE	Kansas State	79.4	zone	1.09	2.22	1.13	54/148
57	Makai CopeWR	Missouri State	79.0	man	2.08	0.96	1.12	79/96
58	JJ BuchananWR · measured at Utah	Michigan	78.5	man	2.34	1.22	1.12	59/169
59	Wayne HarrisWR	Kent State	78.5	zone	0.76	1.88	1.12	63/147
60	Kyle McNealWR	Florida International	77.9	zone	0.37	1.47	1.10	57/180

02 · offense dependence

Most coverage-sensitive pass-catching groups

Team score is the percentile of the sample-weighted man-zone YPRR gap across qualifying players.

122of 122

Rank	Offense	Score	Better vs	Weighted YPRR gap	Qualified players	Split routes
1	South Carolina	100.0	zone	1.78	2	510
2	Tulane	99.2	zone	1.57	2	495
3	Georgia	98.3	man	1.40	3	689
4	UAB	97.5	man	1.36	2	557
5	Indiana	96.7	zone	1.32	5	1,258
6	Florida Atlantic	95.9	man	1.23	4	1,540
7	Florida State	95.0	zone	1.19	4	947
8	Cincinnati	94.2	zone	1.10	5	1,119
9	UTSA	93.4	zone	1.10	6	1,163
10	Oklahoma	92.6	man	1.08	4	1,232
11	LSU	91.7	man	1.08	4	939
12	UTEP	90.9	man	1.07	3	785
13	Louisiana Tech	90.1	man	1.06	2	424
14	Wake Forest	89.3	zone	1.04	3	737
15	NC State	88.4	zone	1.04	6	1,423
16	East Carolina	87.6	zone	1.03	3	810
17	Fresno State	86.8	man	1.02	4	841
18	Texas	86.0	zone	1.01	5	1,211
19	Memphis	85.1	man	1.01	3	721
20	Oregon	84.3	zone	0.99	4	914
21	Ohio	83.5	man	0.98	3	830
22	Kennesaw State	82.6	zone	0.96	5	1,296
23	Washington	81.8	man	0.96	5	1,303
24	Kentucky	81.0	man	0.96	2	469
25	Southern Miss	80.2	zone	0.92	4	1,033
26	Charlotte	79.3	man	0.92	2	532
27	San José State	78.5	man	0.91	4	1,416
28	Texas State	77.7	zone	0.88	5	1,284
29	South Florida	76.9	man	0.87	2	525
30	Kansas	76.0	man	0.87	4	847
31	Arkansas	75.2	zone	0.86	5	1,323
32	Old Dominion	74.4	zone	0.86	3	857
33	Tennessee	73.6	zone	0.86	3	1,077
34	North Carolina	72.7	zone	0.85	2	591
35	Coastal Carolina	71.9	man	0.85	2	408
36	Boise State	71.1	man	0.83	5	1,394
37	Michigan State	70.2	zone	0.83	4	1,157
38	Utah	69.4	zone	0.82	3	703
39	Akron	68.6	zone	0.80	4	883
40	Middle Tennessee	67.8	man	0.79	7	1,728
41	Nevada	66.9	zone	0.79	3	568
42	Vanderbilt	66.1	zone	0.78	5	1,331
43	Ball State	65.3	man	0.78	3	646
44	Ohio State	64.5	zone	0.76	3	762
45	BYU	63.6	zone	0.74	4	1,017
46	Texas Tech	62.8	zone	0.73	4	1,382
47	Kent State	62.0	zone	0.73	2	403
48	South Alabama	61.2	man	0.72	2	459
49	TCU	60.3	zone	0.70	4	1,191
50	Houston	59.5	man	0.70	5	1,234
51	Buffalo	58.7	man	0.70	3	1,031
52	USC	57.9	zone	0.69	3	828
53	Colorado	57.0	man	0.69	4	1,037
54	Missouri State	56.2	zone	0.69	7	1,655
55	Syracuse	55.4	zone	0.67	3	959
56	North Texas	54.5	man	0.67	4	1,136
57	Ole Miss	53.7	zone	0.66	6	1,734
58	Massachusetts	52.9	zone	0.66	3	746
59	Florida International	52.1	zone	0.65	4	992
60	Troy	51.2	man	0.64	5	1,319
61	Toledo	50.4	zone	0.64	3	816
62	UNLV	49.6	man	0.63	4	920
63	Northwestern	48.8	zone	0.63	3	789
64	Notre Dame	47.9	zone	0.62	3	682
65	California	47.1	zone	0.61	5	1,493
66	Alabama	46.3	zone	0.61	5	1,556
67	SMU	45.5	zone	0.60	4	1,251
68	New Mexico	44.6	zone	0.59	4	1,063
69	Oregon State	43.8	zone	0.59	5	1,224
70	Utah State	43.0	zone	0.58	5	1,413
71	James Madison	42.1	zone	0.58	3	710
72	Virginia	41.3	zone	0.58	5	1,428
73	West Virginia	40.5	zone	0.58	3	700
74	UCLA	39.7	zone	0.57	5	1,258
75	Nebraska	38.8	zone	0.57	5	1,291
76	Boston College	38.0	zone	0.56	5	1,584
77	Pittsburgh	37.2	zone	0.55	4	1,270
78	Georgia State	36.4	zone	0.53	3	764
79	Northern Illinois	35.5	zone	0.53	2	424
80	Sam Houston	34.7	man	0.52	5	1,112
81	Hawai'i	33.9	man	0.51	6	1,712
82	Mississippi State	33.1	zone	0.51	4	1,265
83	Jacksonville State	32.2	zone	0.51	5	1,358
84	Purdue	31.4	man	0.50	3	855
85	Western Kentucky	30.6	zone	0.50	3	843
86	Kansas State	29.8	zone	0.50	3	682
87	Auburn	28.9	zone	0.50	2	631
88	Temple	28.1	zone	0.49	4	994
89	Maryland	27.3	zone	0.49	6	1,773
90	Penn State	26.4	zone	0.49	3	690
91	Wyoming	25.6	zone	0.49	2	410
92	Louisville	24.8	man	0.48	2	649
93	Delaware	24.0	zone	0.48	6	1,589
94	Arkansas State	23.1	zone	0.48	4	1,447
95	Marshall	22.3	man	0.47	4	1,043
96	Miami (OH)	21.5	man	0.47	4	1,101
97	New Mexico State	20.7	zone	0.45	5	1,293
98	Clemson	19.8	man	0.45	5	1,179
99	Colorado State	19.0	zone	0.45	5	1,121
100	Baylor	18.2	zone	0.45	4	1,467
101	App State	17.4	zone	0.45	5	1,207
102	Eastern Michigan	16.5	zone	0.44	3	770
103	Florida	15.7	zone	0.44	3	754
104	Missouri	14.9	zone	0.44	5	1,104
105	Duke	14.0	zone	0.43	5	1,600
106	Louisiana	13.2	man	0.43	4	787
107	Texas A&M	12.4	zone	0.42	4	1,031
108	Georgia Southern	11.6	man	0.41	4	1,230
109	Georgia Tech	10.7	man	0.39	2	510
110	Rutgers	9.9	man	0.37	4	1,249
111	Arizona State	9.1	man	0.36	5	1,338
112	Oklahoma State	8.3	man	0.33	3	716
113	Western Michigan	7.4	zone	0.32	4	831
114	Liberty	6.6	zone	0.32	3	540
115	Minnesota	5.8	man	0.30	4	918
116	Stanford	5.0	man	0.29	4	1,253
117	UConn	4.1	man	0.28	5	1,146
118	Illinois	3.3	zone	0.25	3	814
119	UCF	2.5	zone	0.24	4	950
120	Miami	1.7	zone	0.22	3	1,085
121	Washington State	0.8	zone	0.22	3	772
122	Arizona	0.0	zone	0.19	5	1,187

03 · defensive outliers

Farthest from the man-zone median

Outlier score ranks absolute distance from the sport’s qualified median coverage mix.

136of 136

Rank	Defense	Score	Orientation	Man	Zone	From median	Sample
1	Colorado State	100.0	man-heavy	67.1%	32.9%	38.5 pts	1,685 player-snaps
2	Utah	99.3	man-heavy	59.0%	41.0%	30.4 pts	2,809 player-snaps
3	Eastern Michigan	98.5	man-heavy	56.9%	43.1%	28.3 pts	1,903 player-snaps
4	Louisiana Tech	97.8	man-heavy	54.6%	45.4%	26.0 pts	2,899 player-snaps
5	Notre Dame	97.0	man-heavy	54.4%	45.6%	25.8 pts	3,397 player-snaps
6	Wyoming	96.3	man-heavy	51.7%	48.3%	23.0 pts	2,269 player-snaps
7	Colorado	95.6	man-heavy	50.7%	49.3%	22.0 pts	2,361 player-snaps
8	Pittsburgh	94.8	zone-heavy	7.3%	92.7%	21.3 pts	2,780 player-snaps
9	East Carolina	94.1	zone-heavy	7.7%	92.3%	20.9 pts	2,996 player-snaps
10	Indiana	93.3	zone-heavy	8.7%	91.3%	19.9 pts	3,121 player-snaps
11	Ohio	92.6	zone-heavy	8.8%	91.2%	19.8 pts	2,330 player-snaps
12	Rutgers	91.9	man-heavy	47.9%	52.1%	19.3 pts	2,130 player-snaps
13	Boise State	91.1	man-heavy	47.6%	52.4%	19.0 pts	2,806 player-snaps
14	Army	90.4	zone-heavy	10.2%	89.8%	18.4 pts	1,953 player-snaps
15	Navy	89.6	zone-heavy	10.9%	89.1%	17.7 pts	2,599 player-snaps
16	Florida	88.9	zone-heavy	11.4%	88.6%	17.2 pts	2,195 player-snaps
17	Arizona	88.1	man-heavy	45.0%	55.0%	16.4 pts	2,570 player-snaps
18	Boston College	87.4	man-heavy	44.8%	55.2%	16.2 pts	2,565 player-snaps
19	Arkansas State	86.7	zone-heavy	12.6%	87.4%	16.0 pts	2,798 player-snaps
20	Missouri State	85.9	zone-heavy	12.9%	87.1%	15.7 pts	2,983 player-snaps
21	James Madison	85.2	man-heavy	43.7%	56.3%	15.1 pts	3,051 player-snaps
22	Cincinnati	84.4	zone-heavy	13.9%	86.1%	14.8 pts	3,010 player-snaps
23	North Carolina	83.7	man-heavy	43.2%	56.8%	14.6 pts	3,019 player-snaps
24	South Alabama	83.0	zone-heavy	14.1%	85.9%	14.5 pts	2,223 player-snaps
25	TCU	82.2	zone-heavy	14.4%	85.6%	14.2 pts	3,022 player-snaps
26	Clemson	81.5	man-heavy	42.8%	57.2%	14.2 pts	3,344 player-snaps
27	LSU	80.7	man-heavy	42.6%	57.4%	14.0 pts	2,850 player-snaps
28	UCLA	80.0	man-heavy	42.6%	57.4%	14.0 pts	2,328 player-snaps
29	Texas State	79.3	man-heavy	42.2%	57.8%	13.6 pts	2,672 player-snaps
30	Kentucky	78.5	zone-heavy	15.1%	84.9%	13.6 pts	2,405 player-snaps
31	New Mexico	77.8	zone-heavy	15.3%	84.7%	13.3 pts	2,707 player-snaps
32	Nebraska	77.0	man-heavy	41.7%	58.3%	13.1 pts	2,432 player-snaps
33	Coastal Carolina	76.3	zone-heavy	15.6%	84.4%	13.0 pts	2,336 player-snaps
34	Washington	75.6	man-heavy	41.4%	58.6%	12.8 pts	3,331 player-snaps
35	Minnesota	74.8	man-heavy	41.3%	58.7%	12.7 pts	2,796 player-snaps
36	South Florida	74.1	zone-heavy	16.0%	84.0%	12.6 pts	3,720 player-snaps
37	USC	73.3	man-heavy	41.1%	58.9%	12.4 pts	2,862 player-snaps
38	UTSA	72.6	zone-heavy	16.6%	83.4%	12.0 pts	2,759 player-snaps
39	San José State	71.9	zone-heavy	16.6%	83.4%	12.0 pts	2,310 player-snaps
40	Virginia Tech	71.1	zone-heavy	16.7%	83.3%	11.9 pts	2,265 player-snaps
41	Ball State	70.4	zone-heavy	16.7%	83.3%	11.9 pts	2,523 player-snaps
42	Wisconsin	69.6	zone-heavy	16.9%	83.1%	11.7 pts	2,482 player-snaps
43	UNLV	68.9	man-heavy	40.0%	60.0%	11.4 pts	3,288 player-snaps
44	New Mexico State	68.1	zone-heavy	17.7%	82.3%	10.9 pts	2,771 player-snaps
45	Penn State	67.4	man-heavy	39.1%	60.9%	10.5 pts	2,415 player-snaps
46	Auburn	66.7	man-heavy	39.0%	61.0%	10.4 pts	2,619 player-snaps
47	Nevada	65.9	zone-heavy	18.2%	81.8%	10.4 pts	2,440 player-snaps
48	Fresno State	65.2	man-heavy	38.8%	61.2%	10.2 pts	2,961 player-snaps
49	Sam Houston	64.4	man-heavy	38.0%	62.0%	9.4 pts	2,516 player-snaps
50	Louisville	63.7	zone-heavy	19.3%	80.7%	9.3 pts	2,995 player-snaps
51	Iowa State	63.0	zone-heavy	19.4%	80.6%	9.2 pts	2,549 player-snaps
52	Alabama	62.2	zone-heavy	19.4%	80.6%	9.2 pts	3,297 player-snaps
53	Tulane	61.5	man-heavy	37.6%	62.4%	9.0 pts	2,949 player-snaps
54	Western Kentucky	60.7	man-heavy	37.5%	62.5%	8.9 pts	3,519 player-snaps
55	UCF	60.0	man-heavy	37.5%	62.5%	8.9 pts	2,621 player-snaps
56	Akron	59.3	zone-heavy	19.9%	80.1%	8.7 pts	2,415 player-snaps
57	Wake Forest	58.5	zone-heavy	20.0%	80.0%	8.6 pts	3,286 player-snaps
58	Marshall	57.8	man-heavy	37.1%	62.9%	8.5 pts	2,537 player-snaps
59	Ole Miss	57.0	zone-heavy	20.1%	79.9%	8.5 pts	3,693 player-snaps
60	Duke	56.3	man-heavy	37.0%	63.0%	8.4 pts	3,425 player-snaps
61	Old Dominion	55.6	zone-heavy	20.5%	79.5%	8.2 pts	2,977 player-snaps
62	West Virginia	54.8	zone-heavy	20.5%	79.5%	8.1 pts	2,579 player-snaps
63	Troy	54.1	zone-heavy	20.6%	79.4%	8.0 pts	2,373 player-snaps
64	Virginia	53.3	man-heavy	36.6%	63.4%	8.0 pts	2,697 player-snaps
65	Tulsa	52.6	zone-heavy	20.7%	79.3%	7.9 pts	2,326 player-snaps
66	Liberty	51.9	man-heavy	36.3%	63.7%	7.7 pts	2,608 player-snaps
67	Kent State	51.1	man-heavy	36.3%	63.7%	7.7 pts	2,440 player-snaps
68	Illinois	50.4	man-heavy	36.2%	63.8%	7.5 pts	3,051 player-snaps
69	Arkansas	49.6	man-heavy	36.1%	63.9%	7.5 pts	2,333 player-snaps
70	Arizona State	48.9	zone-heavy	21.2%	78.8%	7.4 pts	3,246 player-snaps
71	Middle Tennessee	48.1	man-heavy	36.0%	64.0%	7.4 pts	2,803 player-snaps
72	BYU	47.4	man-heavy	35.7%	64.3%	7.1 pts	3,130 player-snaps
73	Syracuse	46.7	man-heavy	35.6%	64.4%	7.0 pts	2,748 player-snaps
74	North Texas	45.9	man-heavy	35.5%	64.5%	6.9 pts	2,715 player-snaps
75	Charlotte	45.2	zone-heavy	21.8%	78.2%	6.8 pts	2,698 player-snaps
76	Iowa	44.4	zone-heavy	21.8%	78.2%	6.8 pts	2,519 player-snaps
77	Texas Tech	43.7	zone-heavy	22.0%	78.0%	6.6 pts	2,935 player-snaps
78	Air Force	43.0	zone-heavy	22.0%	78.0%	6.6 pts	2,127 player-snaps
79	Ohio State	42.2	man-heavy	35.1%	64.9%	6.5 pts	2,547 player-snaps
80	Central Michigan	41.5	man-heavy	34.9%	65.1%	6.3 pts	2,610 player-snaps
81	Houston	40.7	zone-heavy	22.6%	77.4%	6.0 pts	2,760 player-snaps
82	App State	40.0	man-heavy	34.6%	65.4%	6.0 pts	3,050 player-snaps
83	Kennesaw State	39.3	zone-heavy	22.8%	77.2%	5.8 pts	2,926 player-snaps
84	South Carolina	38.5	man-heavy	34.4%	65.6%	5.8 pts	2,636 player-snaps
85	Oregon State	37.8	man-heavy	34.3%	65.7%	5.7 pts	2,462 player-snaps
86	Hawai'i	37.0	zone-heavy	23.2%	76.8%	5.4 pts	2,967 player-snaps
87	Georgia State	36.3	man-heavy	33.6%	66.4%	5.0 pts	2,423 player-snaps
88	Southern Miss	35.6	zone-heavy	23.7%	76.3%	4.9 pts	3,043 player-snaps
89	Maryland	34.8	man-heavy	33.5%	66.5%	4.9 pts	2,918 player-snaps
90	Baylor	34.1	man-heavy	33.4%	66.6%	4.8 pts	2,490 player-snaps
91	Miami (OH)	33.3	man-heavy	33.4%	66.6%	4.8 pts	3,227 player-snaps
92	Oregon	32.6	man-heavy	33.2%	66.8%	4.6 pts	3,133 player-snaps
93	Louisiana	31.9	zone-heavy	24.1%	75.9%	4.5 pts	2,799 player-snaps
94	San Diego State	31.1	zone-heavy	24.1%	75.9%	4.5 pts	3,178 player-snaps
95	Kansas	30.4	man-heavy	33.0%	67.0%	4.4 pts	2,184 player-snaps
96	Michigan State	29.6	zone-heavy	24.2%	75.8%	4.4 pts	2,297 player-snaps
97	Northwestern	28.9	zone-heavy	24.3%	75.7%	4.3 pts	2,402 player-snaps
98	Oklahoma	28.1	zone-heavy	24.3%	75.7%	4.3 pts	2,832 player-snaps
99	Temple	27.4	man-heavy	32.7%	67.3%	4.1 pts	2,209 player-snaps
100	Washington State	26.7	man-heavy	32.1%	67.9%	3.5 pts	2,067 player-snaps
101	Delaware	25.9	zone-heavy	25.4%	74.6%	3.2 pts	2,740 player-snaps
102	Northern Illinois	25.2	zone-heavy	25.5%	74.5%	3.1 pts	2,212 player-snaps
103	Tennessee	24.4	zone-heavy	25.6%	74.4%	3.1 pts	3,158 player-snaps
104	California	23.7	man-heavy	31.6%	68.4%	3.0 pts	3,175 player-snaps
105	Miami	23.0	zone-heavy	25.7%	74.3%	2.9 pts	3,683 player-snaps
106	SMU	22.2	zone-heavy	25.8%	74.2%	2.9 pts	3,988 player-snaps
107	Georgia Southern	21.5	zone-heavy	25.8%	74.2%	2.8 pts	2,854 player-snaps
108	Stanford	20.7	man-heavy	31.2%	68.8%	2.6 pts	2,923 player-snaps
109	Jacksonville State	20.0	man-heavy	31.2%	68.8%	2.6 pts	3,411 player-snaps
110	Georgia Tech	19.3	zone-heavy	26.2%	73.8%	2.4 pts	2,900 player-snaps
111	Rice	18.5	man-heavy	30.9%	69.1%	2.3 pts	2,655 player-snaps
112	NC State	17.8	zone-heavy	26.3%	73.7%	2.3 pts	3,502 player-snaps
113	Memphis	17.0	man-heavy	30.9%	69.1%	2.2 pts	2,726 player-snaps
114	Texas	16.3	zone-heavy	26.5%	73.5%	2.1 pts	3,760 player-snaps
115	Georgia	15.6	man-heavy	30.7%	69.3%	2.1 pts	3,259 player-snaps
116	Kansas State	14.8	man-heavy	30.6%	69.4%	2.0 pts	2,830 player-snaps
117	Bowling Green	14.1	man-heavy	30.6%	69.4%	1.9 pts	2,340 player-snaps
118	Vanderbilt	13.3	zone-heavy	26.7%	73.3%	1.9 pts	3,229 player-snaps
119	Massachusetts	12.6	zone-heavy	26.8%	73.2%	1.8 pts	2,182 player-snaps
120	Buffalo	11.9	zone-heavy	26.9%	73.1%	1.7 pts	2,494 player-snaps
121	Mississippi State	11.1	zone-heavy	27.3%	72.7%	1.3 pts	3,059 player-snaps
122	Florida International	10.4	man-heavy	29.9%	70.1%	1.3 pts	3,102 player-snaps
123	Michigan	9.6	zone-heavy	27.3%	72.7%	1.3 pts	2,518 player-snaps
124	Texas A&M	8.9	zone-heavy	27.5%	72.5%	1.1 pts	2,649 player-snaps
125	UL Monroe	8.1	zone-heavy	27.6%	72.4%	1.0 pts	2,741 player-snaps
126	Florida State	7.4	man-heavy	29.6%	70.4%	0.9 pts	2,406 player-snaps
127	Utah State	6.7	man-heavy	29.5%	70.5%	0.9 pts	3,320 player-snaps
128	Purdue	5.9	zone-heavy	27.8%	72.2%	0.8 pts	2,285 player-snaps
129	UConn	5.2	zone-heavy	27.9%	72.1%	0.7 pts	2,506 player-snaps
130	Toledo	4.4	zone-heavy	28.0%	72.0%	0.6 pts	2,608 player-snaps
131	Missouri	3.7	man-heavy	29.2%	70.8%	0.6 pts	2,970 player-snaps
132	UAB	3.0	zone-heavy	28.0%	72.0%	0.6 pts	2,125 player-snaps
133	UTEP	2.2	man-heavy	29.0%	71.0%	0.4 pts	2,707 player-snaps
134	Oklahoma State	1.5	man-heavy	28.7%	71.3%	0.1 pts	2,656 player-snaps
135	Florida Atlantic	0.7	zone-heavy	28.6%	71.4%	0.0 pts	2,716 player-snaps
136	Western Michigan	0.0	man-heavy	28.6%	71.4%	0.0 pts	2,709 player-snaps

Methodology and data boundary

These are measured 2025 regular-season splits, not 2026 projections. Player rows show the current 2026 team while preserving the 2025 measured team when it differs. Offense rows describe the 2025 team that generated the routes. Defensive coverage usage sums player coverage snaps, so it is a consistent unit tendency proxy rather than a literal play count. Every ranking is percentile-relative to its qualified population.

Source: PFF 2025 regular-season measurements
Player score: Absolute man-zone YPRR-gap percentile
Offense score: Sample-weighted player gap percentile
Defense score: Distance-from-median percentile
Synthetic rows: None