Alexander Sanchez
App State Mountaineers- Week 1
- vs Maine
- Sat, Sep 5 · 3:30 PM EDT
- Blended projection
- Rec yds 31
- League model
- Rushing projection
- Not published
- No rushing range for this player-week
- Posted line
- None posted
- No capture names this player
- Best bets
- Not on board
- week 1 board
- Scheme Score
- Not graded
- No graded receiving market
- Season projection
- 42.1
- 12.0 games · Half PPR · 6-pt pass TD
- Position rank
- WR481
- #1408 overall
Availability is not an official reportResearch only, and NOT an official team injury report. Every designation here comes from a licensed depth chart or from a hand-reviewed news item with cited sources, so every row is UNVERIFIED relative to an official report: FBS teams publish no mandatory availability report for this to have been checked against. Each row states what its status rests on and when that source said it. Re-check an official inactives list before acting on any of it.A player who is not in this feed has NO availability source on disk. That is not the same as available, and it must not be rendered as one.4258 designations across 138 teams, from generation rotowire-depth-2026-c7dc3fd2170a, observed 2026-09-02T21:14:31Z.
Week 1: vs Maine
The blended passing, rushing, and receiving projections with their ranges and posted lines. Scheme Score stays beside the receiving markets it grades, and the player's Charting evidence is stated once.
Blended projection generationmarket snapshot eef1ca41d906 · training generation 7e4ed6004d69 · blended Sep 4, 5:29 PM ET / Sep 4, 2:29 PM PT2027 CFB/projections/2026_wk{week}_quantiles.csv.manifest.json
Scheme Score generationScheme Score 2026 week 1 · from scheme_scores_2026_week_1.json · generated 2026-09-04T21:39:41+00:00. 471 of 896 rows graded across 874 players. Lines as of Sep 4, 4:51 PM ET / Sep 4, 1:51 PM PT, prices withheld, not live.Scheme Score is a matchup grade, not a betting model and not a projection. Early-season grades run on prior-season scheme and personnel evidence, which our own backtesting says is context, not a validated predictor, so read every grade as matchup color rather than a proven advantage. From week 4 the board switches to current-season data; that version has not been separately validated either, so it stays matchup color.
?
No coverage tilt recorded for this matchup4 scheme reasons
- alignment class 'wide' inferred (inferred_prior_season_alignment): receiver_alignment lists a unique App State WR named 'Alexander Sanchez' with no CFBD id
- the roster/depth chart confirms exactly one WR of that surname on this team, read as the same player despite the name/id mismatch
- no scheme evidence for this matchup (no alignment record or opponent signal)
- ungraded
The grader had no alignment record or opponent signal for this matchup, so the row stays ungraded rather than guessed.
Scheme Score is a matchup grade. It is not a projection, a probability, or an edge against the listed number beside it.
Sources
How this projection was builtModel only
The model’s own projection, unchanged. Neither vendor covered this player.
Two independent projection vendors, named apart because they are different companies: RW (no row for this player) and FP (no row for this player).
Receiving yardsvendor weight 0.00
- Served projection
- 30.7yards
Receiving yards is the model's own projection. Neither vendor covered this player.
Receptionsvendor weight 0.00
- Served projection
- 2.5catches
Receptions is the model's own projection. Neither vendor covered this player.
Generationmarket snapshot eef1ca41d906 · training generation 7e4ed6004d69 · blended Sep 4, 5:29 PM ET / Sep 4, 2:29 PM PT
Shown for Alexander Sanchez, week 1.
Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
No Charting profile could be safely matched to this player.Measured 2025 headline traits, stated once. The complete Charting ledger is further down; the weekly ledger only points back here.
Balanced receiver ranked 1408th overall and WR481 in the 2026 season model.
- WR481 on the versioned 2026 season board.
- -91.9 value over replacement in the season model.
- 4.5 model points per game across 12 covered games.
- 57.5-point season ceiling versus a 42.1 projection.
- Outcomes remain a distribution; rank and projection are not guarantees.
Week 1 vs Maine
21.4 median receiving yards · League model
Range ruler and position context
Exact published season bands and ranks. A missing bound stays missing.
Weekly receiving yards range
12 League model weeks. Prior and baseline rows are excluded.
| Week | Opponent | Floor | Median | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maine | 9.2 | 21.4 | 50.3 |
| 2 | East Carolina | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 3 | Charlotte | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 4 | NC State | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 6 | Old Dominion | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 7 | Coastal Carolina | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 8 | James Madison | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 9 | Georgia Southern | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 10 | Georgia State | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 11 | Marshall | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 12 | UL Monroe | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 13 | South Alabama | 7.1 | 19 | 35.8 |
2026 outlook, week by week
Every scheduled week with its kickoff, site, range, volume signal, basis, role, sources, and Scheme Score grade. The Charting evidence is stated once in the section above; each row points back to it. A week the grader has not published says so rather than borrowing another week's letter.
| Week | Opponent | Site | Kickoff | Receiving yards median | 20th–80th | Volume signal | Basis | Role | Sources | Scheme Score | Charting evidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maine | Home | 21.4 | 9.2–50.3 | Rec yds 21.4 | League model | n/a | How this projection was builtModel onlyThe model’s own projection, unchanged. Neither vendor covered this player. Two independent projection vendors, named apart because they are different companies: RW (no row for this player) and FP (no row for this player). Receiving yardsvendor weight 0.00
Receiving yards is the model's own projection. Neither vendor covered this player. Receptionsvendor weight 0.00
Receptions is the model's own projection. Neither vendor covered this player. Shown for Alexander Sanchez, week 1. | Receiving yards ? No coverage tilt recorded for this matchup4 scheme reasons
The grader had no alignment record or opponent signal for this matchup, so the row stays ungraded rather than guessed. Scheme Score is a matchup grade. It is not a projection, a probability, or an edge against the listed number beside it. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | |
| 2 | East Carolina | Away | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 2 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 3 | Charlotte | Home | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 3 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 4 | NC State | Away | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 4 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 6 | Old Dominion | Home | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 6 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 7 | Coastal Carolina | Away | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 7 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 8 | James Madison | Home | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 8 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 9 | Georgia Southern | Away | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 9 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 10 | Georgia State | Home | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 10 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 11 | Marshall | Away | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 11 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 12 | UL Monroe | Home | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 12 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 13 | South Alabama | Away | 19.0 | 7.1–35.8 | Rec yds 19.0 | League model | n/a | Receiving markets No Scheme Score board for week 13 No grade is carried over from another week. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup |
- Receiving yards
- 21.4
- 20th–80th
- 9.2–50.3
- Volume
- Rec yds 21.4
- Role
- Not graded
How this projection was builtModel only
The model’s own projection, unchanged. Neither vendor covered this player.
Two independent projection vendors, named apart because they are different companies: RW (no row for this player) and FP (no row for this player).
Receiving yardsvendor weight 0.00
- Served projection
- 30.7yards
Receiving yards is the model's own projection. Neither vendor covered this player.
Receptionsvendor weight 0.00
- Served projection
- 2.5catches
Receptions is the model's own projection. Neither vendor covered this player.
Shown for Alexander Sanchez, week 1.
Scheme Score
?
No coverage tilt recorded for this matchup4 scheme reasons
- alignment class 'wide' inferred (inferred_prior_season_alignment): receiver_alignment lists a unique App State WR named 'Alexander Sanchez' with no CFBD id
- the roster/depth chart confirms exactly one WR of that surname on this team, read as the same player despite the name/id mismatch
- no scheme evidence for this matchup (no alignment record or opponent signal)
- ungraded
The grader had no alignment record or opponent signal for this matchup, so the row stays ungraded rather than guessed.
Scheme Score is a matchup grade. It is not a projection, a probability, or an edge against the listed number beside it.
Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 2
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 3
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 4
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 6
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 7
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 8
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 9
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 10
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 11
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 12
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Receiving yards
- 19.0
- 20th–80th
- 7.1–35.8
- Volume
- Rec yds 19.0
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score board for week 13
No grade is carried over from another week.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
2025 position traits and full record
Position-specific traits and written charting notes (pressure, depth, scheme, and alignment splits) lead into every defensible normalized Charting field, with measured window, artifact import, sample, and coverage kept explicit. Missing values remain unpublished.
No Charting profile could be safely matched to this player.
RW Week 1 comparison
Passing, rushing, and receiving stat projections, as a separate source lane. They are not averaged into the League model.
- Rec yards
- 23.3
- Receptions
- 1.43
- Rec TD
- 0.21
- Rush yards
- 0.0
- Rush attempts
- 0.00
- Rush TD
- 0.00
Evidence without blending
Model, historical context, and independent raw stats remain separately labeled from ingestion through display.
12 weekly model forecasts
As of 2026-08-24T23:01:01Z0 labeled context rows
As of 2026-09-04T21:38:52.843849+00:003.6 standard · 5.0 PPR
As of 2026-09-01T23:33:04.176063Z42.1 season points
- Season rank
- #1408
- Position rank
- WR481
- Weekly model rows
- 12
- Value over replacement
- -91.9
Season-board and weekly-model results remain distinct; they are never averaged.
2025 · App State
- Receptions
- 8
- Receiving yards
- 82
- Receiving TD
- 1
- Rushing yards
- 0
5 games · 82 historical receiving yards. Prior production is context, not the 2026 model forecast.
No raw-stat row matched this player, team, and position.
Related WR profiles
Nearby season-board ranks at the same position, with same-team players preferred when available.
Where to go next
This profile connects the player to the best bets board, this week's matchup report, the team report, and the wider player board.
Methodology and data boundary
The current custom half-PPR season board uses six-point passing touchdowns and one point per 20 passing yards. Its season ranks and ranges stay separate from the full-PPR weekly distributions. Posted lines are dated captures shown with their capture count and time; the operator that quoted each number stays in the source record and is never published. Recruiting priors and recent-form baselines are labeled context and excluded from betting-facing model surfaces. Projection source C contributes raw stats only; its scoring points, rank, ownership, and roster fields are excluded. The RW Week 1 projection is displayed as an independent comparison and receives no automatic blend weight. Its retained local file time is disclosure metadata, not provider publication time. Charting grades and charting metrics measure the 2025 season; any embedded League projection context is shown separately. When present, observed Week 1 passing and target views come from a separately pinned cfbfastR/SportsDataverse generation and do not update either projection. No missing range or game prediction is inferred.
- Season model
- custom-fantasy-2026-half_ppr_6pt_td_20pass-usage_aware-5b1c102afd16
- Weekly model
- cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
- Best bets board
- Week 1 · 0 rows here
- Observed update
- No completed-game layer
- RW Week 1
- 3.6 standard · 5.0 PPR
- Current market rows
- No resolved row