Durell Robinson
Colorado State Rams- Week 1
- vs Wyoming
- Sat, Sep 5 · 6:00 PM EDT
- Blended projection
- Rush yds 31
- Source-only projection, not model-priced
- Rushing projection
- 31.0 yds
- 9.4 to 50.3 · 20th to 80th
- Posted line
- None posted
- No capture names this player
- Best bets
- Not on board
- week 1 board
- Scheme Score
- Not graded
- No graded receiving market
- Season projection
- 108.1
- 12.0 games · Half PPR · 6-pt pass TD
- Position rank
- RB167
- #960 overall
Availability is not an official reportResearch only, and NOT an official team injury report. Every designation here comes from a licensed depth chart or from a hand-reviewed news item with cited sources, so every row is UNVERIFIED relative to an official report: FBS teams publish no mandatory availability report for this to have been checked against. Each row states what its status rests on and when that source said it. Re-check an official inactives list before acting on any of it.A player who is not in this feed has NO availability source on disk. That is not the same as available, and it must not be rendered as one.4258 designations across 138 teams, from generation rotowire-depth-2026-c7dc3fd2170a, observed 2026-09-02T21:14:31Z.
Week 1: vs Wyoming
The blended passing, rushing, and receiving projections with their ranges and posted lines. Scheme Score stays beside the receiving markets it grades, and the player's Charting evidence is stated once.
Blended projection generationmarket snapshot eef1ca41d906 · training generation 7e4ed6004d69 · blended Sep 4, 5:29 PM ET / Sep 4, 2:29 PM PT2027 CFB/projections/2026_wk{week}_quantiles.csv.manifest.json
Scheme Score generationScheme Score 2026 week 1 · from scheme_scores_2026_week_1.json · generated 2026-09-04T21:39:41+00:00. 471 of 896 rows graded across 874 players. Lines as of Sep 4, 4:51 PM ET / Sep 4, 1:51 PM PT, prices withheld, not live.Scheme Score is a matchup grade, not a betting model and not a projection. Early-season grades run on prior-season scheme and personnel evidence, which our own backtesting says is context, not a validated predictor, so read every grade as matchup color rather than a proven advantage. From week 4 the board switches to current-season data; that version has not been separately validated either, so it stays matchup color.
This week is vendor-only: the model does not cover Durell Robinson in week 1, so the numbers are filled from the RW and FP projections. They are matchup evidence, are not model-priced, and carry no edge against a line.
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only.
No Scheme Score this week
This week’s board carries no graded row for this player and market.No Scheme Score this week
This week’s board carries no graded row for this player and market.Sources
Vendor projection, not model-pricedVendor projection, not model-priced
No model projection stands behind this number. The row was filled from the vendors, so it is scheme and fantasy context and is not priced against a market.
Two independent projection vendors, named apart because they are different companies: RW (identity absent) and FP (identity no_model_row).
Rushing yardsvendor weight 1.00
- Served projection
- 31.0yards
- FP
- 31.0yards
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Rushing yards is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line.
Receiving yardsvendor weight 1.00
- Served projection
- 6.0yards
- FP
- 6.0yards
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Receiving yards is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line.
Receptionsvendor weight 1.00
- Served projection
- 1.0catches
- FP
- 1.0catches
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Receptions is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line.
Blend weight comes from the receiving-role confirmation tier, which this row reads as unavailable. The tier is receiving-role evidence, so a passer or a pure rusher lands outside it and does not blend at the default weights.
Generationmarket snapshot eef1ca41d906 · training generation 7e4ed6004d69 · blended Sep 4, 5:29 PM ET / Sep 4, 2:29 PM PT
Shown for Durell Robinson, week 1.
Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
No Charting profile could be safely matched to this player.Measured 2025 headline traits, stated once. The complete Charting ledger is further down; the weekly ledger only points back here.
Flexible backfield piece ranked 960th overall and RB167 in the 2026 season model.
- RB167 on the versioned 2026 season board.
- -60.4 value over replacement in the season model.
- 144.5-point season ceiling versus a 108.1 projection.
- Source-only projection drives the weekly context; it is not model output. Source-only rows are not betting eligible.
Not published
A best matchup is shown only when a League model week exists; prior and baseline context are not promoted into a recommendation.
Range ruler and position context
Exact published season bands and ranks. A missing bound stays missing.
2026 outlook, week by week
Every scheduled week with its kickoff, site, range, volume signal, basis, role, sources, and Scheme Score grade. The Charting evidence is stated once in the section above; each row points back to it. A week the grader has not published says so rather than borrowing another week's letter.
1 week on this page is vendor-only: the model does not cover this player that week, so the row is filled from the RW and FP projections. Those rows are matchup evidence, are not model-priced, and carry no edge against a market line.
| Week | Opponent | Site | Kickoff | Rushing yards median | 20th–80th | Volume signal | Basis | Role | Sources | Scheme Score | Charting evidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wyoming | Home | 25.1 | 9.4–50.3 | Rush yds 25.1 | Source-only projection, not model-priced | n/a | Vendor projection, not model-pricedVendor projection, not model-pricedNo model projection stands behind this number. The row was filled from the vendors, so it is scheme and fantasy context and is not priced against a market. Two independent projection vendors, named apart because they are different companies: RW (identity absent) and FP (identity no_model_row). Rushing yardsvendor weight 1.00
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Rushing yards is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line. Receiving yardsvendor weight 1.00
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Receiving yards is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line. Receptionsvendor weight 1.00
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Receptions is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line. Blend weight comes from the receiving-role confirmation tier, which this row reads as unavailable. The tier is receiving-role evidence, so a passer or a pure rusher lands outside it and does not blend at the default weights. Shown for Durell Robinson, week 1. | Receiving yards No Scheme Score this week This week’s board carries no graded row for this player and market.Receptions No Scheme Score this week This week’s board carries no graded row for this player and market. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | |
| 2 | Southern Utah | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 3 | BYU | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 4 | UTSA | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 5 | Oregon State | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 7 | Texas State | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 8 | San Diego State | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 9 | Utah State | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 10 | Boise State | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 11 | Washington State | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 12 | Fresno State | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 13 | TBD | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup |
- Rushing yards
- 25.1
- 20th–80th
- 9.4–50.3
- Volume
- Rush yds 25.1
- Role
- Not graded
Vendor projection, not model-pricedVendor projection, not model-priced
No model projection stands behind this number. The row was filled from the vendors, so it is scheme and fantasy context and is not priced against a market.
Two independent projection vendors, named apart because they are different companies: RW (identity absent) and FP (identity no_model_row).
Rushing yardsvendor weight 1.00
- Served projection
- 31.0yards
- FP
- 31.0yards
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Rushing yards is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line.
Receiving yardsvendor weight 1.00
- Served projection
- 6.0yards
- FP
- 6.0yards
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Receiving yards is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line.
Receptionsvendor weight 1.00
- Served projection
- 1.0catches
- FP
- 1.0catches
Vendor projection, not model-priced. Receptions is filled from FP; the model does not cover this row, so there is no model number to compare and no edge against a market line.
Blend weight comes from the receiving-role confirmation tier, which this row reads as unavailable. The tier is receiving-role evidence, so a passer or a pure rusher lands outside it and does not blend at the default weights.
Shown for Durell Robinson, week 1.
Scheme Score
No Scheme Score this week
This week’s board carries no graded row for this player and market.No Scheme Score this week
This week’s board carries no graded row for this player and market.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
2025 position traits and full record
Position-specific traits and written charting notes (pressure, depth, scheme, and alignment splits) lead into every defensible normalized Charting field, with measured window, artifact import, sample, and coverage kept explicit. Missing values remain unpublished.
No Charting profile could be safely matched to this player.
RW Week 1 comparison
Passing, rushing, and receiving stat projections, as a separate source lane. They are not averaged into the League model.
- Rec yards
- 5.7
- Receptions
- 0.84
- Rec TD
- 0.06
- Rush yards
- 51.3
- Rush attempts
- 11.00
- Rush TD
- 0.45
Evidence without blending
Model, historical context, and independent raw stats remain separately labeled from ingestion through display.
0 weekly model forecasts
As of 2026-08-24T23:01:01Z1 labeled context row
As of 2026-09-04T21:38:52.843849+00:008.8 standard · 9.7 PPR
As of 2026-09-01T23:33:04.176063Z108.1 season points
- Season rank
- #960
- Position rank
- RB167
- Weekly model rows
- 0
- Value over replacement
- -60.4
Season-board and weekly-model results remain distinct; they are never averaged.
2025 · Auburn
- Rush attempts
- 3
- Rushing yards
- 57
- Rushing TD
- 1
- Receptions
- 0
2 games · 57 historical rushing yards. Prior production is context, not the 2026 model forecast.
No raw-stat row matched this player, team, and position.
Related RB profiles
Nearby season-board ranks at the same position, with same-team players preferred when available.
Where to go next
This profile connects the player to the best bets board, this week's matchup report, the team report, and the wider player board.
Methodology and data boundary
The current custom half-PPR season board uses six-point passing touchdowns and one point per 20 passing yards. Its season ranks and ranges stay separate from the full-PPR weekly distributions. Posted lines are dated captures shown with their capture count and time; the operator that quoted each number stays in the source record and is never published. Recruiting priors and recent-form baselines are labeled context and excluded from betting-facing model surfaces. Projection source C contributes raw stats only; its scoring points, rank, ownership, and roster fields are excluded. The RW Week 1 projection is displayed as an independent comparison and receives no automatic blend weight. Its retained local file time is disclosure metadata, not provider publication time. Charting grades and charting metrics measure the 2025 season; any embedded League projection context is shown separately. When present, observed Week 1 passing and target views come from a separately pinned cfbfastR/SportsDataverse generation and do not update either projection. No missing range or game prediction is inferred.
- Season model
- custom-fantasy-2026-half_ppr_6pt_td_20pass-usage_aware-5b1c102afd16
- Weekly model
- cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
- Best bets board
- Week 1 · 0 rows here
- Observed update
- No completed-game layer
- RW Week 1
- 8.8 standard · 9.7 PPR
- Current market rows
- No resolved row