
Isaiah Sategna
Oklahoma Sooners- Week 1
- vs UTEP
- Fri, Sep 4 · 8:00 PM EDT
- Blended projection
- Not published
- No week 1 forecast
- Posted line
- None posted
- No capture names this player
- Best bets
- Tier B · #29
- week 1 board
- Scheme Score
- Not graded
- No graded receiving market
- Draft guide projection
- 193.7
- 12.0 games · Current scoring
- Position rank
- WR6
- #13 overall
Availability is not an official reportResearch only, and NOT an official team injury report. Every designation here comes from a licensed depth chart or from a hand-reviewed news item with cited sources, so every row is UNVERIFIED relative to an official report: FBS teams publish no mandatory availability report for this to have been checked against. Each row states what its status rests on and when that source said it. Re-check an official inactives list before acting on any of it.A player who is not in this feed has NO availability source on disk. That is not the same as available, and it must not be rendered as one.4258 designations across 138 teams, from generation rotowire-depth-2026-c7dc3fd2170a, observed 2026-09-02T21:14:31Z.
Week 1: vs UTEP
The blended projection with its range, each posted line beside it, the sources behind the number, the Scheme Score grade for each receiving market, and the player's PFF evidence, stated once. Rows on the best-bets board carry their tier and rank.

No weekly model, vendor, or context row covers Isaiah Sategna for this game, so there is no projection to set beside a line. The best-bets board still carries this player; see below.
- Tier B · #29Receiving yards over 57.5
WR projection profile ranked 13th overall and WR6 in the 2026 season model.
- WR6 on the versioned 2026 season board.
- +59.8 value over replacement in the season model.
- 257.2-point season ceiling versus a 193.7 projection.
- Outcomes remain a distribution; rank and projection are not guarantees.
Not published
A best matchup is shown only when a League model week exists; prior and baseline context are not promoted into a recommendation.
Range ruler and position context
Exact published season bands and ranks. A missing bound stays missing.
2026 outlook, week by week
Every scheduled week with its kickoff, site, range, volume signal, basis, role, sources, and Scheme Score grade. The PFF evidence is stated once in the section above; each row points back to it. A week the grader has not published says so rather than borrowing another week's letter.
Scheme Score generationScheme Score 2026 week 1 · from scheme_scores_2026_week_1.json · generated 2026-09-02T22:13:52+00:00. 403 of 916 rows graded across 891 players. Lines as of Sep 2, 5:54 PM ET / Sep 2, 2:54 PM PT, merged from 3 captures back to Sep 2, 11:52 AM ET / Sep 2, 8:52 AM PT, prices withheld, not live.Scheme Score is a matchup grade, not a betting model and not a projection. Early-season grades run on prior-season scheme and personnel evidence, which our own backtesting says is context, not a validated predictor, so read every grade as matchup color rather than a proven advantage. From week 4 the board switches to current-season data; that version has not been separately validated either, so it stays matchup color.
| Week | Opponent | Site | Kickoff | Median | 20th–80th | Volume signal | Basis | Role | Sources | Scheme Score | PFF evidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UTEP | Home | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 2 | Michigan | Away | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 3 | New Mexico | Home | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 4 | Georgia | Away | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 6 | Texas | Neutral | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 7 | Kentucky | Home | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 8 | Mississippi State | Away | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 9 | South Carolina | Home | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 10 | Florida | Away | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 11 | Ole Miss | Home | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 12 | Texas A&M | Home | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup | ||
| 13 | Missouri | Away | n/a | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | PFF evidence No PFF evidence | Matchup |
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
- Median
- n/a
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.PFF evidence
No PFF evidence
2025 position traits and full record
Position-specific traits and written charting notes (pressure, depth, scheme, and alignment splits) lead into every defensible normalized PFF field, with measured window, artifact import, sample, and coverage kept explicit. Missing values remain unpublished.
No canonical PFF contract resolved for this player.
RotoWire Week 1 comparison
Standard and PPR fantasy points plus the underlying position stats, as a separate source lane. They are not averaged into the League model.
- Rec yards
- 87.2
- Receptions
- 5.83
- Rec TD
- 0.61
- Rush yards
- 2.0
- Rush attempts
- 0.34
- Rush TD
- 0.02
Current RotoWire market rows
The captured line, the RotoWire projection, the recalculated gap, and the vendor's own lean. Price, payout terms, and operator names are withheld; this is not a recommendation.
| Matchup | Market | Posted line | RotoWire | Projection gap | Vendor lean | Weighted hit rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OU vs UTEP2026-09-04 · 5:00 pm | Receiving Yards | 56.5 | 87.2 | +30.7+54.3% | More | 63% |
Evidence without blending
Model, historical context, and independent raw stats remain separately labeled from ingestion through display.
No weekly player-intelligence model available
As of 2026-08-16T14:45:09+00:000 labeled context rows
As of 2026-08-16T14:45:09+00:0012.7 standard · 18.6 PPR
As of 2026-09-01T23:33:04.176063Z193.7 season points
- Season rank
- #13
- Position rank
- WR6
- Weekly model rows
- 0
- Value over replacement
- +59.8
League-specific draft scoring. No weekly player-intelligence model is published for this fallback profile.
No prior FBS stat line is present in the source contract.
No raw-stat row matched this player, team, and position.
Related WR profiles
Nearby season-board ranks at the same position, with same-team players preferred when available.
Take the dossier into the next evidence layer
This profile connects the player to the best bets board, this week's matchup report, the team field manual, and the wider player board.
Methodology and data boundary
This fallback profile uses the 2026 draft-guide projection for the league's half-PPR, six-point-touchdown scoring. No weekly player-intelligence, Yahoo raw-stat, historical-prior, or PFF profile is inferred when unavailable.
- Projection source
- 2026 draft guide
- Weekly model
- cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
- Best bets board
- Week 1 · 1 row here
- Observed update
- No completed-game layer
- RotoWire Week 1
- 12.7 standard · 18.6 PPR
- Current market rows
- 1