Alonza Barnett
UCF Knights- Week 2
- at Pittsburgh
- Sat, Sep 12 · 3:30 PM EDT
- Blended projection
- Not published
- No week 2 forecast
- Rushing projection
- Not published
- No rushing range for this player-week
- Posted line
- None posted
- No capture names this player
- Best bets
- Not on board
- board not published
- Scheme Score
- Not graded
- No graded receiving market
- Draft guide projection
- 316.4
- 12.0 games · Current scoring
- Position rank
- QB31
- #504 overall
Availability is not an official reportResearch only, and NOT an official team injury report. Every designation here comes from a licensed depth chart or from a hand-reviewed news item with cited sources, so every row is UNVERIFIED relative to an official report: FBS teams publish no mandatory availability report for this to have been checked against. Each row states what its status rests on and when that source said it. Re-check an official inactives list before acting on any of it.A player who is not in this feed has NO availability source on disk. That is not the same as available, and it must not be rendered as one.4258 designations across 138 teams, from generation rotowire-depth-2026-c7dc3fd2170a, observed 2026-09-02T21:14:31Z.
On two boards this week
The matchup grade published for this player's posted line, read off the same board a reader would open by hand. It is not a projection, a probability, or an edge against the number.
Rushing boardOpen his row
DRushing Yards 39.5
- Run volumeB
- WorkloadC
- Gap fit--
- TrenchB
- TacklingF
matchup grade only, never backtested
Passing boardOpen his row
Matchup leans upPassing Yards 229.5
- Pass volumecleared
- Coverage allowedcleared
- Passing yards allowedcleared
- Pressure--
run-heavy offence
Week 2: at Pittsburgh
The blended passing, rushing, and receiving projections with their ranges and posted lines. Scheme Score stays beside the receiving markets it grades, and the player's Charting evidence is stated once.
No weekly model, vendor, or context row covers Alonza Barnett for this game, so there is no projection to set beside a line. The season outlook and weekly ledger below remain available.
QB projection profile ranked 504th overall and QB31 in the 2026 season model.
- QB31 on the versioned 2026 season board.
- -41.5 value over replacement in the season model.
- 395.4-point season ceiling versus a 316.4 projection.
- Outcomes remain a distribution; rank and projection are not guarantees.
Not published
A best matchup is shown only when a League model week exists; prior and baseline context are not promoted into a recommendation.
Range ruler and position context
Exact published season bands and ranks. A missing bound stays missing.
2026 outlook, week by week
Every scheduled week with its kickoff, site, range, volume signal, basis, role, sources, and Scheme Score grade. The Charting evidence is stated once in the section above; each row points back to it. A week the grader has not published says so rather than borrowing another week's letter.
Scheme Score generationScheme Score 2026 week 1 · from scheme_scores_2026_week_1.json · generated 2026-09-04T21:39:41+00:00. 471 of 896 rows graded across 874 players. Lines as of Sep 4, 4:51 PM ET / Sep 4, 1:51 PM PT, prices withheld, not live.Scheme Score is a matchup grade, not a betting model and not a projection. Early-season grades run on prior-season scheme and personnel evidence, which our own backtesting says is context, not a validated predictor, so read every grade as matchup color rather than a proven advantage. From week 4 the board switches to current-season data; that version has not been separately validated either, so it stays matchup color.
| Week | Opponent | Site | Kickoff | Passing yards median | 20th–80th | Volume signal | Basis | Role | Sources | Scheme Score | Charting evidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bethune | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 2 | Pittsburgh | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 3 | Georgia State | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 4 | TCU | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 5 | Houston | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 6 | Oklahoma State | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 8 | BYU | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 9 | Baylor | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 10 | Kansas | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 11 | Arizona State | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 12 | Iowa State | Home | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup | ||
| 13 | Colorado | Away | Not published | Not published | Not published | Schedule only | n/a | Receiving markets Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with. | Charting evidence No Charting evidence | Matchup |
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
- Median
- Not published
- 20th–80th
- Not published
- Volume
- Not published
- Role
- Not graded
Scheme Score
Scheme Score grades receiving yards and receptions only
This projection publishes no receiving yards or receptions, so there is no Scheme Score market to pair it with.Charting evidence
No Charting evidence
2025 position traits and full record
Position-specific traits and written charting notes (pressure, depth, scheme, and alignment splits) lead into every defensible normalized Charting field, with measured window, artifact import, sample, and coverage kept explicit. Missing values remain unpublished.
No Charting profile could be safely matched to this player.
RW Week 1 comparison
Passing, rushing, and receiving stat projections, as a separate source lane. They are not averaged into the League model.
- Pass yards
- 243.6
- Pass TD
- 1.41
- Interceptions
- 0.69
- Rush yards
- 39.0
- Rush attempts
- 8.33
- Rush TD
- 0.67
Evidence without blending
Model, historical context, and independent raw stats remain separately labeled from ingestion through display.
No weekly player-intelligence model available
As of 2026-09-04T21:38:52.843849+00:000 labeled context rows
As of 2026-09-04T21:38:52.843849+00:0023.5 standard · 23.5 PPR
As of 2026-09-01T23:28:53.062284Z316.4 season points
- Season rank
- #504
- Position rank
- QB31
- Weekly model rows
- 0
- Value over replacement
- -41.5
League-specific draft scoring. No weekly player-intelligence model is published for this fallback profile.
No prior FBS stat line is present in the source contract.
No raw-stat row matched this player, team, and position.
Related QB profiles
Nearby season-board ranks at the same position, with same-team players preferred when available.
Where to go next
This profile connects the player to the best bets board, this week's matchup report, the team report, and the wider player board.
Methodology and data boundary
This fallback profile uses the 2026 draft-guide projection for the league's half-PPR, six-point-touchdown scoring. No weekly player-intelligence, Projection source C raw-stat, historical-prior, or Charting profile is inferred when unavailable.
- Projection source
- 2026 draft guide
- Weekly model
- cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
- Best bets board
- Not published
- Observed update
- No completed-game layer
- RW Week 1
- 23.5 standard · 23.5 PPR
- Current market rows
- No resolved row