College football/Week 2/Player prop gambling research
Rushing matchup grades
How each posted rusher’s matchup grades out this week, on five legs, with the evidence and the gaps behind every letter. It is a matchup grade and nothing more: no projection, no probability, and no edge against the posted number.
Week 278posted rushers | matchup grade, not a projection
- Grade generated
- Sep 9, 5:53 PM EDT
- When the grade ran, not when you are reading it
- Rows published
- 78 posted, 76 graded
- Nothing is withheld for thin evidence
- Backtested
- Never
- No leg has been tested against a rushing result
- Posted
- 78
- Rushing Yards
- Graded
- 76
- 2 published ungraded
- A or better
- 12
- Strongest matchups on this board only
- Thin sample
- 76
- At least one leg rests on a sample the module itself calls thin
- Score range
- 25.0-82.4
- Rank inside this week’s graded rushers
Publication boundary
The Rushing Matchup Grade is a matchup grade, not a betting model and not a projection. It has never been backtested: no leg in it has been tested against a rushing result, and the even split between its volume and efficiency halves was chosen by argument rather than fitted. A grade is a rank among the rushers this week's data could grade, so it says where a matchup sits on the slate, never what a player will gain. Every posted player is published, and a row whose evidence was thin or missing is labelled as such rather than withheld, so read the sample qualifier alongside the grade.
A score, a letter, and the legs under both
Each row carries a 0-100 score, a letter, all five legs with their own letters, how many of them cleared, and the reasons and flags the module raised. The posted line is shown because it is what put the row here.
A rank on this board, not a national one
score is the rank among every rusher the grade module could grade this week; the letter grade ranks within this board's graded rows, so an A+ means the strongest rushing matchup posted, not the strongest in the country. Each leg's letter ranks within that leg's own graded population.
No projection, no price, no pick
A posted line appears on every row because it is what put the row on the board. No price, no payout, and no operator is published anywhere on this site, and nothing here is a pick, a probability, or an edge against the posted number.
One posted board
76 graded | 2 ungraded | 76 thin78 rushers, strongest matchup first
Every posted player is published, including the ones whose evidence is thin and the ones the module could not score. Nothing is withheld for being weak: each row carries its own sample qualifier so the evidence behind it can be judged rather than assumed.
78 of 78 published rows
| Sample | Evidence | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yasin WillisKansas vs Missouri · RB | Rushing Yards52.5 posted | 82.4of 100 | A+Never backtested | Run volumeA+ graded A+WorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 2 | Rueben OwensTexas A&M vs Arizona State · RB | Rushing Yards79.5 posted | 79.7of 100 | A+Never backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadA graded AGap fitB graded BTrenchA graded ATacklingB graded B5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 3 | Dylan EdwardsKansas vs Missouri · RB | Rushing Yards39.5 posted | 77.2of 100 | A+Never backtested | Run volumeA+ graded A+WorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 4 | Isaiah MarshallKansas vs Missouri · QB | Rushing Yards39.5 posted | 75.9of 100 | A+Never backtested | Run volumeA+ graded A+WorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 5 | Keelon RussellAlabama vs Kentucky · QB | Rushing Yards55.5 posted | 70.5of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingA graded A4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 6 | Evan DickensBoston College vs Rutgers · RB | Rushing Yards57.5 posted | 69.7of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 7 | Antwan RaymondRutgers vs Boston College · RB | Rushing Yards86.5 posted | 68.6of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitB graded BTrenchA graded ATacklingB graded B5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 8 | Cam EdwardsMichigan State vs Eastern Michigan · RB | Rushing Yards109.5 posted | 67.3of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeA graded AWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitC graded CTrenchF graded FTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 9 | Fame IjeboiPurdue vs Wake Forest · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 66.7of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitB graded BTrenchC graded CTacklingA graded A5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 10 | Bo MacCormackBoston College vs Rutgers · RB | Rushing Yards34.5 posted | 66.1of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitB graded BTrenchC graded CTacklingB graded B5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 11 | Terrance GibbsGeorgia Southern vs Clemson · RB | Rushing Yards29.5 posted | 64.8of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volume not graded, left out of the scoreWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingA graded A3 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 12 | Mason McKenzieBoston College vs Rutgers · QB | Rushing Yards66.5 posted | 64.4of 100 | ANever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 13 | Daniel HillAlabama vs Kentucky · RB | Rushing Yards45.5 posted | 64.2of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitF graded FTrenchB graded BTacklingA graded A5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 14 | Godspower NwawuiheArmy vs South Florida · RB | Rushing Yards55.5 posted | 64.0of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 15 | Jamal RobertsMissouri vs Kansas · RB | Rushing Yards86.5 posted | 63.6of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeA graded AWorkloadA graded AGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 16 | Anthony WoodsUCLA vs San Diego State · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 62.9of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 17 | Wayne KnightUCLA vs San Diego State · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 62.9of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 18 | Amareon BlueEastern Michigan vs Michigan State · RB | Rushing Yards49.5 posted | 62.5of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 19 | Jordon DavisonOregon vs Oklahoma State · RB | Rushing Yards89.5 posted | 62.5of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitC graded CTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 20 | DeSean BishopTennessee vs Georgia Tech · RB | Rushing Yards99.5 posted | 61.6of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fitC graded CTrenchC graded CTacklingA graded A5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 21 | Austyn DendyBowling Green vs Nebraska · RB | Rushing Yards49.5 posted | 61.5of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadA graded AGap fitD graded DTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 22 | Marcel ReedTexas A&M vs Arizona State · QB | Rushing Yards37.5 posted | 61.5of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadD graded DGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 23 | LJ MartinBYU vs Arizona · RB | Rushing Yards92.5 posted | 61.3of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA+ graded A+TacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 24 | Darius TaylorMinnesota vs Mississippi State · RB | Rushing Yards99.5 posted | 61.2of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fitD graded DTrenchB graded BTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 25 | Dierre HillOregon vs Oklahoma State · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 60.9of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadA graded AGap fitC graded CTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 26 | Nico IamaleavaUCLA vs San Diego State · QB | Rushing Yards49.5 posted | 60.8of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 27 | Jamal RuleNebraska vs Bowling Green · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 60.7of 100 | BNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fitA graded ATrenchD graded DTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 28 | CJ BaxterKentucky vs Alabama · RB | Rushing Yards49.5 posted | 60.3of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 29 | Bo JacksonOhio State vs Texas · RB | Rushing Yards59.5 posted | 60.1of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitC graded CTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 30 | Kyson BrownArizona State vs Texas A&M · RB | Rushing Yards41.5 posted | 59.9of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 31 | Adam MohammedCalifornia vs Syracuse · RB | Rushing Yards89.5 posted | 59.4of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeA graded AWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 32 | Ja'Kobi JacksonOhio State vs Texas · RB | Rushing Yards19.5 posted | 59.3of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitC graded CTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 33 | Cale HellumsArmy vs South Florida · QB | Rushing Yards113.5 posted | 58.8of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA graded ATacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 34 | Mekhi NelsonNebraska vs Bowling Green · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 58.8of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitA graded ATrenchD graded DTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 35 | Raleek BrownTexas vs Ohio State · RB | Rushing Yards42.5 posted | 58.0of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fitF graded FTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 36 | Wayshawn ParkerUtah vs Arkansas · RB | Rushing Yards89.5 posted | 57.2of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeA graded AWorkloadB graded BGap fitD graded DTrenchC graded CTacklingF graded F5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 37 | Hollywood SmothersTexas vs Ohio State · RB | Rushing Yards34.5 posted | 57.1of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitF graded FTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 38 | Sutton SmithArkansas vs Utah · RB | Rushing Yards42.5 posted | 55.0of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadA graded AGap fitD graded DTrenchD graded DTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 39 | Cyncir BowersUConn vs Maryland · RB | Rushing Yards39.5 posted | 54.7of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeA graded AWorkloadB graded BGap fitF graded FTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 40 | Jason PattersonKentucky vs Alabama · RB | Rushing Yards24.5 posted | 54.1of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fitF graded FTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 41 | Duke WatsonUCF vs Pittsburgh · RB | Rushing Yards42.5 posted | 53.7of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 42 | Faizon BrandonTennessee vs Georgia Tech · QB | Rushing Yards31.5 posted | 53.4of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingA graded A4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 43 | Nate SheppardDuke vs Illinois · RB | Rushing Yards110.5 posted | 53.1of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitF graded FTrenchC graded CTacklingB graded B5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 44 | DeJuan WilliamsMaryland vs UConn · RB | Rushing Yards79.5 posted | 52.9of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 45 | Lloyd AvantOklahoma vs Michigan · RB | Rushing Yards49.5 posted | 52.3of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadA graded AGap fitD graded DTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 46 | Marcellous HawkinsVirginia Tech vs Old Dominion · RB | Rushing Yards79.5 posted | 52.1of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fitB graded BTrenchC graded CTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 47 | Kedrick ReescanoArizona vs BYU · RB | Rushing Yards41.5 posted | 51.0of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadA graded AGap fitF graded FTrenchA graded ATacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 48 | Jeffrey OvertonVirginia Tech vs Old Dominion · RB | Rushing Yards59.5 posted | 51.0of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fitA graded ATrenchC graded CTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 49 | Ty ClarkWake Forest vs Purdue · RB | Rushing Yards79.5 posted | 50.1of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 50 | Gideon DavidsonClemson vs Georgia Southern · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 49.9of 100 | CNever backtested | Run volume not graded, left out of the scoreWorkloadA graded AGap fitF graded FTrenchD graded DTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 51 | Bear BachmeierBYU vs Arizona · QB | Rushing Yards36.5 posted | 49.5of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadD graded DGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchA+ graded A+TacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 52 | Ca'Lil ValentineIllinois vs Duke · RB | Rushing Yards69.5 posted | 49.5of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitD graded DTrenchB graded BTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 53 | Justice HaynesGeorgia Tech vs Tennessee · RB | Rushing Yards64.5 posted | 49.2of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchF graded FTacklingB graded B4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 54 | Aidan LaugheryIllinois vs Duke · RB | Rushing Yards50.5 posted | 48.1of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadA graded AGap fitD graded DTrenchB graded BTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 55 | Xavier RobinsonOklahoma vs Michigan · RB | Rushing Yards24.5 posted | 47.9of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadB graded BGap fitC graded CTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 56 | Arch ManningTexas vs Ohio State · QB | Rushing Yards27.5 posted | 47.7of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadF graded FGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 57 | Caleb HawkinsOklahoma State vs Oregon · RB | Rushing Yards57.5 posted | 47.2of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitD graded DTrenchF graded FTacklingD graded D5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 58 | Gio LopezWake Forest vs Purdue · QB | Rushing Yards29.5 posted | 45.2of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 59 | Devon DampierUtah vs Arkansas · QB | Rushing Yards51.5 posted | 45.0of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeA graded AWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 60 | Bryce UnderwoodMichigan vs Oklahoma · QB | Rushing Yards30.5 posted | 44.8of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 61 | Alonza BarnettUCF vs Pittsburgh · QB | Rushing Yards39.5 posted | 44.5of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 62 | Jordan MarshallMichigan vs Oklahoma · RB | Rushing Yards63.5 posted | 44.4of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadA+ graded A+Gap fitD graded DTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 63 | Carson HansenPenn State vs Temple · RB | Rushing Yards89.5 posted | 43.1of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fitD graded DTrenchD graded DTacklingF graded F5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 64 | Savion HiterMichigan vs Oklahoma · RB | Rushing Yards27.5 posted | 42.9of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchC graded CTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 65 | Cameron PettawayIowa State vs Iowa · RB | Rushing Yards30.5 posted | 42.5of 100 | DNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchF graded FTacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 66 | KJ JacksonArkansas vs Utah · QB | Rushing Yards19.5 posted | 42.4of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeB graded BWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchD graded DTacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 67 | Fluff BothwellMississippi State vs Minnesota · RB | Rushing Yards59.5 posted | 41.6of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fitF graded FTrenchD graded DTacklingF graded F5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 68 | Anthony ColandreaNebraska vs Bowling Green · QB | Rushing Yards31.5 posted | 41.5of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadC graded CGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchD graded DTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 69 | Aiden FloraIowa State vs Iowa · RB | Rushing Yards41.5 posted | 40.5of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchF graded FTacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 70 | Kamari MoultonIowa vs Iowa State · RB | Rushing Yards109.5 posted | 40.2of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchF graded FTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 71 | Devin RocheOld Dominion vs Virginia Tech · RB | Rushing Yards59.5 posted | 39.9of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadA graded AGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchF graded FTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 72 | John MateerOklahoma vs Michigan · QB | Rushing Yards28.5 posted | 39.7of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadD graded DGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingC graded C4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 73 | Ja'Kyrian TurnerPittsburgh vs UCF · RB | Rushing Yards79.5 posted | 39.0of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadA graded AGap fitC graded CTrenchD graded DTacklingF graded F5 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 74 | Quinn HenicleOld Dominion vs Virginia Tech · QB | Rushing Yards59.5 posted | 35.7of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchF graded FTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 75 | Katin HouserIllinois vs Duke · QB | Rushing Yards19.5 posted | 32.1of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeF graded FWorkloadF graded FGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchB graded BTacklingD graded D4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 76 | Kamario TaylorMississippi State vs Minnesota · QB | Rushing Yards59.5 posted | 25.0of 100 | FNever backtested | Run volumeC graded CWorkloadF graded FGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrenchD graded DTacklingF graded F4 of 5 legs scored | SampleThin sample: At least one leg behind this row rests on a sample the module itself calls thin. | |
| 77 | CharMar BrownMiami vs Florida A&M · HB | Rushing Yards50.5 posted | No score: too few legs cleared to score this row, so it publishes ungraded | UngradedNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadB graded BGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrench not graded, left out of the scoreTackling not graded, left out of the score2 of 5 legs scored | SampleNot graded: Too few legs cleared to score this row. It publishes with the grade left blank rather than being withheld. | |
| 78 | Mark FletcherMiami vs Florida A&M · HB | Rushing Yards84.5 posted | No score: too few legs cleared to score this row, so it publishes ungraded | UngradedNever backtested | Run volumeD graded DWorkloadA graded AGap fit not graded, left out of the scoreTrench not graded, left out of the scoreTackling not graded, left out of the score2 of 5 legs scored | SampleNot graded: Too few legs cleared to score this row. It publishes with the grade left blank rather than being withheld. |
- A+
- 4
- A
- 8
- B
- 15
- C
- 23
- D
- 15
- F
- 11
- Ungraded
- 2
Five readings, scored apart
5 legsWhat each leg measures
Each leg carries its own letter, ranked inside that leg’s own graded population. A leg whose sample did not clear the module’s bar carries no letter and is dropped from the score rather than guessed at, so two rows sharing a letter can rest on four legs and on two.
Run volume
- What it reads
- How much this offence runs, and how much this matchup projects it to.
Workload
- What it reads
- How much of his own backfield this rusher carries.
Gap fit
- What it reads
- Where he runs against where this defence gives ground.
Trench
- What it reads
- His blocking against the front opposite it.
Tackling
- What it reads
- How often this front misses the tackle once it arrives.
Checkable, not asserted
Generated 2026-09-09T21:53:13ZWhere every number came from
The files this week’s board was built from, each with the byte count and SHA-256 recorded when it was read. A derivation nobody can check is a claim about provenance rather than provenance.
rushing matchup grades
- File
- rushing_matchup_2026_wk2.csv
- Rows
- 1090 · 1153089 bytes
- SHA-256
- aeb184288079c8563d08a05976f190ab560e2e9a117425470059073fa066232c
posted board
- File
- priced_board.csv
- Rows
- 78 · 29889 bytes
- SHA-256
- da0fd857d5fd8fd07a982669787268362821a71e48e6cb234b6aaf803d077b31
Trace the evidence
Move from a row to its source page
Every rusher on this board has a dossier, and the two neighbouring boards grade the other halves of the same slate.
Methodology and data boundary
Every player with a posted Rushing Yards line, one row each. A player quoted by more than one source is one row, not several. Rows that could not be graded are published with the grade left blank. This is a matchup grade, not a betting model and not a projection. No leg in it has been tested against a result, so it says where a matchup sits on this week’s slate and never what a player will gain. A posted line appears on every row because it is what put the row on the board. No price, no payout, and no operator is published anywhere on this site, and nothing here is a pick, a probability, or an edge against the posted number.
- Board generated
- 2026-09-09T23:07:43+00:00
- Population
- posted board
- Rows
- 78 posted, 76 graded
- Backtested
- Never
- Source file
- rushing_scores_2026_week_2.json